Kosturko v. Wisse

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Kosturko v. Wisse

147 A. 919, 7 N.J. Misc. 912, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 110

DecidedOctober 21, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 147 A. 919 (Kosturko v. Wisse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kosturko v. Wisse, 147 A. 919, 7 N.J. Misc. 912, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 110 (N.J. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

This was an action seeking to recover damages alleged to have been caused by the negligent operation of a motor car by the defendant. The trial of the issue resulted in a verdict in favor of the defendant below.

By the present rule the plaintiffs seek to have such finding against them set aside for the reason, as urged, that it is against the weight of the evidence.

We conclude that the proofs presented such a question as not to warrant the setting aside of the settlement thereof and finding thereon by the jury.

The rule is therefore discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

This was an action seeking to recover damages alleged to have been caused by the negligent operation of a motor car by the defendant. The trial of the issue resulted in a verdict in favor of the defendant below.

By the present rule the plaintiffs seek to have such finding against them set aside for the reason, as urged, that it is against the weight of the evidence.

We conclude that the proofs presented such a question as not to warrant the setting aside of the settlement thereof and finding thereon by the jury.

The rule is therefore discharged.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 A. 919, 7 N.J. Misc. 912, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kosturko-v-wisse-nj-1929.