Kostelecky v. Kostelecky
This text of 2007 ND 63 (Kostelecky v. Kostelecky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 5/1/07 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2007 ND 59
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Verdane Georgeson, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20060211
Appeal from the District Court of Benson County, Northeast Judicial District, the Honorable Lee A. Christofferson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
James P. Wang, State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 211, Minnewaukan, N.D. 58351-
0211, for plaintiff and appellee.
Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, 402 1st Street NW, Mandan, N.D. 58554-3118, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Georgeson
[¶1] Verdane Georgeson appeals a criminal judgment convicting him of gross sexual imposition, arguing the trial court’s preliminary instruction and jury admonishments constituted reversible error, and that there was insufficient evidence to convict him. Georgeson’s appeal is completely without merit, and the judgment is supported by substantial evidence. Therefore, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (3).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2007 ND 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kostelecky-v-kostelecky-nd-2007.