Koste v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Koste v. State

928 S.W.2d 407, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1526, 1996 WL 509980

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Koste v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 49 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 10, 1996·No. No. 69794·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, James Koste, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the decision of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. As no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal opinion, we affirm the judgment of the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, James Koste, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the decision of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. As no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal opinion, we affirm the judgment of the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Koste v. State, 928 S.W.2d 407, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1526, 1996 WL 509980 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

928 S.W.2d 407 (Koste v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.