Kossoff v. Rathgeb-Walsh, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kossoff v. Rathgeb-Walsh, Inc.

3 A.D.2d 712, 159 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6530

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 4, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 3 A.D.2d 712 (Kossoff v. Rathgeb-Walsh, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kossoff v. Rathgeb-Walsh, Inc., 3 A.D.2d 712, 159 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6530 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by a lower lot owner to recover damages because of seepage of surface water which flowed from the property of the higher lot owner, the appeal is from a judgment entered on the dismissal of the complaint at the close of the case. Judgment affirmed, with costs. (Bennett v. Cupina, 253 N. Y. 436.) Wenzel, Beldoek, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and to grant a new trial, with the following memorandum: The evidence was sufficient to present a question of fact as to whether or not the natural flow of the surface water from the higher ground adjacent to appellant’s property had been diverted by grading and paving and by the erection of structures thereon to appellant’s damage. (Cf. Jutte v. Hughes, 67 N. Y. 267; Tremblay v. Harmony Mills, 171 N. Y. 598.) Bennett v. Cupina (253 N. Y. 436) involved the right of a lower owner to divert from his land surface water flowing from the higher ground by filling and grading his land for the purpose of improving his property.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by a lower lot owner to recover damages because of seepage of surface water which flowed from the property of the higher lot owner, the appeal is from a judgment entered on the dismissal of the complaint at the close of the case. Judgment affirmed, with costs. (Bennett v. Cupina, 253 N. Y. 436.) Wenzel, Beldoek, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and to grant a new trial, with the following memorandum: The evidence was sufficient to present a question of fact as to whether or not the natural flow of the surface water from the higher ground adjacent to appellant’s property had been diverted by grading and paving and by the erection of structures thereon to appellant’s damage. (Cf. Jutte v. Hughes, 67 N. Y. 267; Tremblay v. Harmony Mills, 171 N. Y. 598.) Bennett v. Cupina (253 N. Y. 436) involved the right of a lower owner to divert from his land surface water flowing from the higher ground by filling and grading his land for the purpose of improving his property.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 A.D.2d 712, 159 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kossoff-v-rathgeb-walsh-inc-nyappdiv-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack