Kossie, Ex Parte Darrell Wayne

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 6, 2008
DocketAP-75,831
StatusPublished

This text of Kossie, Ex Parte Darrell Wayne (Kossie, Ex Parte Darrell Wayne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kossie, Ex Parte Darrell Wayne, (Tex. 2008).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NOS. AP-75,831 & AP-75,832
EX PARTE DARRELL WAYNE KOSSIE, Applicant


ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 973065 IN THE 262
ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and sentenced to thirty-five years' imprisonment. The First Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Kossie v. State, No. 01-04-00770-CR (Tex. App. - Houston [1st Dist.] October 13, 2005, no pet.) Applicant filed his first writ of habeas corpus in the district court on October 12, 2006. He filed his second writ in the district court on December 19, 2007. Both writs were forwarded to this Court at the same time. Although they both challenge the same conviction, the second writ is not barred by Article 11.07, Section 4 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure because this Court had not disposed of the first writ before the second writ was filed.

In both writs Applicant contends, inter alia, that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed. Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel did not receive timely notice of the court of appeals' decision, and therefore failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the First Court of Appeals in Cause No. 01-04-00770-CR that affirmed his conviction in Case No. 973065 from the 262nd Judicial District Court of Harris County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with the First Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this Court's mandate issues.

Applicant's remaining claims are dismissed. See Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).



Delivered: February 6, 2008

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Wilson
956 S.W.2d 25 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Riley
193 S.W.3d 900 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Ex Parte Torres
943 S.W.2d 469 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kossie, Ex Parte Darrell Wayne, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kossie-ex-parte-darrell-wayne-texcrimapp-2008.