Kosoy Kendall Associates, LLC. v. Los Latinos Restaurant Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kosoy Kendall Associates, LLC. v. Los Latinos Restaurant Inc.

10 So. 3d 1168, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6223, 2009 WL 1457127

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 27, 2009

Docket3D09-1289

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 10 So. 3d 1168 (Kosoy Kendall Associates, LLC. v. Los Latinos Restaurant Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kosoy Kendall Associates, LLC. v. Los Latinos Restaurant Inc., 10 So. 3d 1168, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6223, 2009 WL 1457127 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Upon the lessee’s failure to timely deposit a monthly rental payment into the registry as required by court order 1 under section 83.232, Florida Statute, the petitioner — landlord was absolutely entitled to an ex parte, immediate default for a writ of possession of the premises by section 83.232(5), Florida Statute. 2 See Key Largo Watersports, Inc. v. Whitehurst Family P’ship, 954 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); 214 Main St. Corp. v. Tanksley, 947 So.2d 490 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Courthouse Tower, Ltd. v. Manzini & Assoc., 683 So.2d 215 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). See also Miami Subs Real Estate Corp. v. Manhattan House, Inc., 973 So.2d 593 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)(per curiam). Because the trial court refused, after an adversarial hearing which was itself unauthorized, to issue the writ and, notwithstanding such wholly irrelevant facts as that the payment was subsequently tendered, see Main St. Corp., 947 So.2d at 492, we grant the present application for mandamus and order that a writ of possession issue forthwith. See Main St. Corp., 947 So.2d at 492; Courthouse Tower, Ltd, 683 So.2d at 215. See also Com *1169 coa, Inc. v. Coe, 587 So.2d 474 (Fla. 3d DCA1991).

Mandamus granted. 3

1

. The payment was due February 1, 2009, the landlord sought, filed an ex parte motion for possession on February 2, 2009. The tenant did not tender a payment until February 5, 2009.

2

. § 83.232(5), Fla. Stat. provides:

Failure of the tenant to pay the rent into the court registry pursuant to court order shall be deemed an absolute waiver of the tenant's defenses. In such case, the landlord is entided to an immediate default for possession without further notice or hearing thereon.

3

. This decision takes effect immediately without regard to the filing or disposition of any motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Upon the lessee’s failure to timely deposit a monthly rental payment into the registry as required by court order 1 under section 83.232, Florida Statute, the petitioner — landlord was absolutely entitled to an ex parte, immediate default for a writ of possession of the premises by section 83.232(5), Florida Statute. 2 See Key Largo Watersports, Inc. v. Whitehurst Family P’ship, 954 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); 214 Main St. Corp. v. Tanksley, 947 So.2d 490 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Courthouse Tower, Ltd. v. Manzini & Assoc., 683 So.2d 215 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). See also Miami Subs Real Estate Corp. v. Manhattan House, Inc., 973 So.2d 593 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)(per curiam). Because the trial court refused, after an adversarial hearing which was itself unauthorized, to issue the writ and, notwithstanding such wholly irrelevant facts as that the payment was subsequently tendered, see Main St. Corp., 947 So.2d at 492, we grant the present application for mandamus and order that a writ of possession issue forthwith. See Main St. Corp., 947 So.2d at 492; Courthouse Tower, Ltd, 683 So.2d at 215. See also Com *1169 coa, Inc. v. Coe, 587 So.2d 474 (Fla. 3d DCA1991).

Mandamus granted. 3

1

. The payment was due February 1, 2009, the landlord sought, filed an ex parte motion for possession on February 2, 2009. The tenant did not tender a payment until February 5, 2009.

2

. § 83.232(5), Fla. Stat. provides:

Failure of the tenant to pay the rent into the court registry pursuant to court order shall be deemed an absolute waiver of the tenant's defenses. In such case, the landlord is entided to an immediate default for possession without further notice or hearing thereon.

3

. This decision takes effect immediately without regard to the filing or disposition of any motion for rehearing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 So. 3d 1168, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6223, 2009 WL 1457127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kosoy-kendall-associates-llc-v-los-latinos-restaurant-inc-fladistctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack