Kosoco, Inc. v. Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

NOTICE OF ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-14-00515-CV Style: Kosoco, Inc. v Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County * Date motion filed : March 2, 2015 Type of motion: Amended Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Clerk’s Record Party filing motion: Appellee, Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County Document to be filed: Supplemental Clerk’s Record

If motion to extend time: Deadline to file document: Number of previous extensions granted: Length of extension sought:

Ordered that motion is:

Granted If document is to be filed, document due:

The Clerk is instructed to file the document as of the date of this order Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

Denied

Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

On February 17, 2015, the county clerk hand-filed a supplemental clerk’s record containing decipherable photographs, which, the county clerk has informed this Court, are in the condition in which the trial court viewed them. See Roventini v. Ocular Sciences, Inc., 111 S.W.3d 719, 726 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no pet.) (reviewing trial court’s ruling based upon materials before trial court at time of ruling).

Judge's signature: /s/ Terry Jennings Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of ______________________________

Date: March 17, 2015 November 7, 2008 Revision