KOSMAL v. Ameritech

Michigan Supreme Court

KOSMAL v. Ameritech

711 N.W.2d 17, 474 Mich. 1064

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided February 27, 2006·No. 127064·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

711 N.W.2d 17 (2006) 474 Mich. 1064

Kathleen KOSMAL, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
AMERITECH, Defendant-Appellant, and
Second Injury Fund (Vocationally Handicapped Provisions), Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 127064 (21), COA No. 254936.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

February 27, 2006.

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of August 30, 2005 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

711 N.W.2d 17 (2006) 474 Mich. 1064

Kathleen KOSMAL, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
AMERITECH, Defendant-Appellant, and
Second Injury Fund (Vocationally Handicapped Provisions), Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 127064 (21), COA No. 254936.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

February 27, 2006.

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of August 30, 2005 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

KOSMAL v. Ameritech, 711 N.W.2d 17, 474 Mich. 1064 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

711 N.W.2d 17 (KOSMAL v. Ameritech) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Kathleen KOSMAL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERITECH, Defendant-Appellant, and Second Injury Fund (Vocationally Handicapped Provisions), Defendant-Appellee.

Related

Kathleen KOSMAL, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
AMERITECH, Defendant-Appellant, and
Second Injury Fund (Vocationally Handicapped Provisions), Defendant-Appellee.