Koslosky v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Koslosky v. State

101 S.W.2d 237, 131 Tex. Crim. 559, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 33

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 20, 1937·No. No. 18733·Published

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of theft of chickens, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the county jail for a term of ninety days and a fine of $200.00.

This is a companion case to that of Miller v. State, this day decided. The same questions are raised in this case as were raised in that case. Hence we do not deem it necessary to again enter upon an extended discussion thereof, further than to say that all of the matters complained of are overruled for the reasons stated in said case of Miller v. State, supra. The judgment is affirmed .

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of theft of chickens, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the county jail for a term of ninety days and a fine of $200.00.

This is a companion case to that of Miller v. State, this day decided. The same questions are raised in this case as were raised in that case. Hence we do not deem it necessary to again enter upon an extended discussion thereof, further than to say that all of the matters complained of are overruled for the reasons stated in said case of Miller v. State, supra. The judgment is affirmed .

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Koslosky v. State, 101 S.W.2d 237, 131 Tex. Crim. 559, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 33 (Tex. 1937).

Pincite

101 S.W.2d 237 (Koslosky v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.