Koskoff v. Planning & Zoning Commission
This text of 608 A.2d 695 (Koskoff v. Planning & Zoning Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 443, is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court’s decision and remand the case with direction to grant the writ of mandamus on the ground that a failure of a planning and zoning commission properly to publish a prehearing notice, as required by General Statutes § 8-26, amounted to a failure of the commission to act pursuant to General Statutes §§ 8-26 and 8-26d?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
608 A.2d 695, 222 Conn. 912, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koskoff-v-planning-zoning-commission-conn-1992.