Kosidlo v. Kosidlo

607 P.2d 1, 125 Ariz. 18, 1979 Ariz. LEXIS 387
Arizona Supreme Court·Decided December 20, 1979·No. No. 14631-PR·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Richard C. Kosidlo brought this appeal seeking a review of certain provisions of a decree of dissolution, and his former wife, Carrol J. Kosidlo, cross-appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed. We accepted review. Opinion of the Court of Appeals, 125 Ariz.App. 32, 607 P.2d 15 (App.1979) disapproved in part.

We hold that the facts as stated by the Court of Appeals do not show an abandonment of the cross-appeal. So much of the opinion as relates to the cross-appeal is disapproved, and the record in this cause is ordered returned to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the cross-appeal on its merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kosidlo v. Kosidlo, 607 P.2d 1, 125 Ariz. 18, 1979 Ariz. LEXIS 387 (Ark. 1979).

607 P.2d 1 (Kosidlo v. Kosidlo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Emma Spring v. Timothy R. Bradford
Arizona Supreme Court, 2017
Spring v. Bradford
388 P.3d 849 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2017)
In Re the Marriage of Dorman
9 P.3d 329 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2000)
Toth v. Toth
946 P.2d 900 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1997)
Styers v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF MOHAVE
779 P.2d 352 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1989)
Martin v. Martin
752 P.2d 1038 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1988)
Plowman v. Arizona State Liquor Board
732 P.2d 222 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1986)
Standage v. Standage
711 P.2d 612 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1985)
Martin v. Porak
638 P.2d 853 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1981)