Kosher v. Stuart

121 P. 901, 64 Or. 123, 1913 Ore. LEXIS 17
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 28, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 121 P. 901 (Kosher v. Stuart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kosher v. Stuart, 121 P. 901, 64 Or. 123, 1913 Ore. LEXIS 17 (Or. 1913).

Opinions

Opinion by

Me. Chief Justice Eakin.

1. This is a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that there is no order or judgment from which an appeal will lie under Section 549, L. O. L., which provides that any party to a judgment other than one given by confession or for want of an answer may appeal therefrom. The judgment appealed from is in form a judgment by default, but the defendants made some effort to appear and answer. The trial court adjudged them in default, and the appeal is for the purpose of reviewing the pro[125]*125ceedings to determine whether or not they were in default. Therefore we cannot determine that there was no answer, and dismiss the appeal without reviewing the record and determining the merits of the appeal, and under such circumstances the motion must be denied. Sears v. Dunbar, 50 Or. 36 (91 Pac. 145); Grover v. Hawthorne, 62 Or. 65 (116 Pac. 100). Denied.

(129 Pac. 491.) For appellants there was a brief and an oral argument by Mr. Hayward H. Riddell.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rajneesh Foundation International v. McGreer
721 P.2d 867 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)
Russell v. Piper
201 P. 436 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 P. 901, 64 Or. 123, 1913 Ore. LEXIS 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kosher-v-stuart-or-1913.