Kosek v. Wilkes-Barre Township School District

170 A. 279, 314 Pa. 18, 1934 Pa. LEXIS 435
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 2, 1934
DocketAppeal, 127
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 170 A. 279 (Kosek v. Wilkes-Barre Township School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kosek v. Wilkes-Barre Township School District, 170 A. 279, 314 Pa. 18, 1934 Pa. LEXIS 435 (Pa. 1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The sole question raised by this appeal is whether a medical inspector of a third class school district is an “appointed officer,” subject to removal by the school board under the provisions of article VI, section 4 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania. The facts upon which this question is predicated are set forth in the opinion of the Superior Court repoi'ted at 110 Pa. Superior Ct. 295, and need not be repeated here. We are of opinion the Superior Court correctly decided appellee was not a public officer subject to removal from office at the pleasure of the power by which he had been appointed, i. e., the school board.

Appellee’s appointment as medical inspector was made pursuant to the provisions of section 1501 of the Act of May 18, 1911, P. L. 309, as amended (the School Code). The amount of his salary was determined by the school board, which thereupon entered into a contract providing for his employment at the agreed figure for a period of ten months. The nature of the services performed *20 by a medical inspector precludes Ms classification as a public officer. He exercises none of the sovereign prerogatives of the State, but, on the contrary, his duties are of routine character, subject to the control and direction of the school board. As stated in the opinion of the Superior Court, “......the status of the medical inspector arises directly from a contract of hiring between Mm and the school district. The salary of the medical inspector is fixed by the employer, no commission is issued, no oath is taken, and the appointment is made at the discretion of the board” within prescribed limits.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scally v. Falls Township
44 Pa. D. & C.3d 363 (Bucks County Court of Common Pleas, 1987)
Mine Inspector Salaries
68 Pa. D. & C. 411 (Pennsylvania Department of Justice, 1949)
Saar v. Hanlon
60 A.2d 432 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1948)
Tanenbaum v. D'Ascenzo
51 A.2d 757 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1946)
Kratz v. Sloane
54 Pa. D. & C. 317 (Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas, 1945)
Alvey v. Brigham
151 S.W.2d 935 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1940)
Hetkowski v. Dickson City Borough School District
15 A.2d 470 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1940)
Weiss v. Ziegler
193 A. 642 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 A. 279, 314 Pa. 18, 1934 Pa. LEXIS 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kosek-v-wilkes-barre-township-school-district-pa-1934.