Korzhina v. Sessions
This text of 707 F. App'x 917 (Korzhina v. Sessions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The court has considered the Respondent’s motion to amend, Dkt. No. 83, and the Petitioner’s opposition, Dkt. No. 84. The Respondent’s Motion to Amend Opinion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
The memorandum disposition filed on October 20, 2017 is amended as follows:
Replace the text on p. 2, line 19 and p. 3, lines 1-2 with the following:
Ms. Korzhina’s petition for review of the BIA’s denial of her motion to reopen is GRANTED, and we remand on an open record to allow the agency to resolve the •application in light of current country conditions.
The Respondent’s motion to amend is otherwise DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
707 F. App'x 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/korzhina-v-sessions-ca9-2017.