Home/New York Court of Appeals/Korycka v. SA Healy Co.

Korycka v. SA Healy Co.

169 N.E.2d 9, 8 N.Y.2d 968
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 8, 1960
StatusPublished

This text of 169 N.E.2d 9 (Korycka v. SA Healy Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Korycka v. SA Healy Co., 169 N.E.2d 9, 8 N.Y.2d 968 (N.Y. 1960).

Opinion

8 N.Y.2d 968 (1960)

Edward L. Korycka, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
S. A. Healy Company, Defendant-Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Thomas Adair Contracting Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued May 26, 1960.
Decided July 8, 1960.

Samuel Harris Cohen and Benjamin H. Siff for plaintiff-appellant.

Norman C. Mendes, John A. Bergmann and John J. Tarpey for S. A. Healy Company, respondent and third-party plaintiff-appellant.

William F. McNulty for Thomas Adair Contracting Corp., third-party defendant-respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and FOSTER.

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Korycka v. S. A. Healy Co.
8 N.Y.2d 968 (New York Court of Appeals, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 N.E.2d 9, 8 N.Y.2d 968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/korycka-v-sa-healy-co-ny-1960.