Kory Allen Battiest v. State
This text of Kory Allen Battiest v. State (Kory Allen Battiest v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-19-00094-CR
KORY ALLEN BATTIEST, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 6th District Court Lamar County, Texas Trial Court No. 28050
Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. ORDER
Court reporter Terry Spangler recorded the trial court proceedings in appellate cause
number 06-19-00094-CR, styled Kory Allen Battiest v. The State of Texas, trial court cause number
28050 in the 6th Judicial District Court of Lamar County, Texas. The reporter’s record was
originally due June 24, 2019. The record has not been filed, and Spangler has not requested an
extension of the filing deadline, even after receiving email correspondence from this Court
inquiring about the status of the record.
The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure establish that “trial and appellate courts are jointly
responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.” TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c). The
Rules further instruct that an “appellate court may enter any order necessary to ensure the timely
filing of the appellate record.” Id. In furtherance of our responsibilities established by the Rules,
we find we must take steps to ensure that the record in this case is filed in a reasonable amount of
time.
Therefore, we order Spangler to file the reporter’s record in cause number 06-19-00094-
CR, styled Kory Allen Battiest v. The State of Texas, trial court cause number 28050 in the 6th
Judicial District Court of Lamar County, Texas, to be received no later than July 24, 2019.
If the reporter’s record is not received by July 24, we warn Spangler that we may begin
contempt proceedings and order her to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of this
Court for failing to obey its order.
2 IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: July 3, 2019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kory Allen Battiest v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kory-allen-battiest-v-state-texapp-2019.