Korwin Jeanal Wilburn v. State
This text of Korwin Jeanal Wilburn v. State (Korwin Jeanal Wilburn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS and Opinion Filed April 30, 2019
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00390-CR
KORWIN JEANAL WILBURN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F16-33130-N
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck, Osborne, and Reichek Opinion by Justice Reichek Korwin Jeanal Wilburn appeals the trial court’s order deferring adjudication for assault
family violence, with a deadly weapon. Appellant entered into a plea agreement with the State,
which included waiving his right to appeal. The trial court followed the plea agreement and
deferred adjudication of guilt, placing appellant on community supervision for nine months. The
trial court prepared and signed a certification of the right to appeal, stating this case is a plea
bargain case and appellant had no right to appeal. Appellant then filed his notice of appeal with
this Court. For the reason that follows, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
A defendant in a criminal case has the right of appeal as set out in the code of criminal
procedure and the rules of appellate procedure. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02); TEX.
R. APP. P. 25.2(a). Rule 25.2 provides that in “a plea-bargain case—that is, a case in which a defendant’s plea was guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the punishment
recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant,” a defendant may appeal only
“those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial,” or “after getting
the trial court’s permission to appeal.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). When an appellant waives his
right to appeal as part of his plea bargain agreement with the State, a subsequent notice of appeal
filed by him fails to “initiate the appellate process,” thereby depriving this Court of jurisdiction
over the appeal. Lundgren v. State, 434 S.W.3d 594, 599, 600 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).
Here, appellant entered into a plea agreement with the State, agreeing to plead nolo
contendere in exchange for the State’s recommendation that he be placed on deferred adjudication
for nine months. He also waived his right to appeal. On January 30, 2019, the trial court followed
the plea bargain agreement and placed appellant on deferred adjudication for nine months. The
trial court’s certification of appellant’s right to appeal states the case involves a plea bargain
agreement and appellant has no right to appeal. Under these circumstances, appellant’s notice of
appeal is ineffective to initiate the appellate process, and we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See
id.
We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
/Amanda L. Reichek/ AMANDA L. REICHEK Do Not Publish JUSTICE TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b) 190390F.U05
–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
KORWIN JEANAL WILBURN, Appellant On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-19-00390-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F16-33130-N. Opinion delivered by Justice Reichek, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Schenck and Osborne participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal.
Judgment entered April 30, 2019
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Korwin Jeanal Wilburn v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/korwin-jeanal-wilburn-v-state-texapp-2019.