Korte Foundations, Inc. v. Smith

Missouri Court of Appeals

Korte Foundations, Inc. v. Smith

823 S.W.2d 68, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1711, 1991 WL 238291

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 19, 1991·No. No. 58201·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendants appeal after the trial court entered judgment establishing a mechanic’s lien on their property. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendants appeal after the trial court entered judgment establishing a mechanic’s lien on their property. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Korte Foundations, Inc. v. Smith, 823 S.W.2d 68, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1711, 1991 WL 238291 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

823 S.W.2d 68 (Korte Foundations, Inc. v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.