Korta v. Rausch Equipment Corp.
This text of 73 A.D.2d 824 (Korta v. Rausch Equipment Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: To resist a motion to dismiss for failure to serve a complaint after a demand plaintiff must (1) show that the delay is excusable and (2) submit proof by one having knowledge that the cause of action is meritorious (Dobbins v County of Erie, 65 AD2d 934, 935; Allen v Berton, 55 AD2d 1049). Plaintiff has failed to satisfy either of these requirements and the court abused its discretion in granting reargument and vacating its original order dismissing the action. (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court—reargument of motion to dismiss.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 A.D.2d 824, 423 N.Y.S.2d 750, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/korta-v-rausch-equipment-corp-nyappdiv-1979.