Korst v. Heath

89 So. 368, 82 Fla. 107
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 5, 1921·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment aforesaid, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the récord having beén seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

.All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Korst v. Heath, 89 So. 368, 82 Fla. 107 (Fla. 1921).

89 So. 368 (Korst v. Heath) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.