Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Korrol Manufacturing Co. v. Mandula

Korrol Manufacturing Co. v. Mandula

180 Misc. 379, 44 N.Y.S.2d 635
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMay 25, 1943
StatusPublished

This text of 180 Misc. 379 (Korrol Manufacturing Co. v. Mandula) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Korrol Manufacturing Co. v. Mandula, 180 Misc. 379, 44 N.Y.S.2d 635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff established and proved a prima facie case of fraud and deceit. It was therefore error to dismiss the complaint at the end of plaintiff’s case and to direct judgment for the defendant.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event. Appeal from order dismissed.

Shientag, Rosenman and McLaughlin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 Misc. 379, 44 N.Y.S.2d 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/korrol-manufacturing-co-v-mandula-nyappterm-1943.