Korotki v. Tofany
This text of 38 A.D.2d 738 (Korotki v. Tofany) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to annul respondent’s determination dated January 29, 1970, which revoked petitioner’s license to operate a motor vehicle. Determination confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs. The evidence adduced before the Referee at the revocation hearing presented close questions as to whether (a) petitioner had actually been operating the automobile in question and intended to drive it at the time he was arrested for driving in an intoxicated condition, (b) petitioner was intoxicated or reacting to medication he had been taking under his physician’s direction and prescription and (c) petitioner comprehended the questions and warning given to him at the station house under section 1194 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, because of his alleged reaction [739]*739to medication he claimed he had taken that day. Nevertheless, since substantial evidence was received which would justify respondent’s determination, the determination should be confirmed (cf. Matter of Haywood v. Craig Colony, 7 A D 2d 69, 72, affd. 6 N Y 2d 752). Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 A.D.2d 738, 329 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/korotki-v-tofany-nyappdiv-1972.