Koropjeck v. . Bohack
111 N.E. 1090, 216 N.Y. 751, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1540
This text of 111 N.E. 1090 (Koropjeck v. . Bohack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Koropjeck v. . Bohack, 111 N.E. 1090, 216 N.Y. 751, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1540 (N.Y. 1916).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Hogan, Seabury and Pound, JJ. Dissenting: Hiscock, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
111 N.E. 1090, 216 N.Y. 751, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koropjeck-v-bohack-ny-1916.