Korobkin v. Chalek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Korobkin v. Chalek

13 A.D.2d 704, 214 N.Y.S.2d 63, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11299

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 24, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 704 (Korobkin v. Chalek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Korobkin v. Chalek, 13 A.D.2d 704, 214 N.Y.S.2d 63, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11299 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 15, 1960, direct[705]*705ing him to file a transcript of parts.of plaintiff’s examination before trial, taken before an Official Referee. Appeal dismissed, without costs. The order is not appealable. The direction to defendant to file the transcript, conceded to be in his possession, does not involve any “part of the merits” or affect “a substantial right” (see Civ. Prac. Act, § 609). Beldoek, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 15, 1960, direct[705]*705ing him to file a transcript of parts.of plaintiff’s examination before trial, taken before an Official Referee. Appeal dismissed, without costs. The order is not appealable. The direction to defendant to file the transcript, conceded to be in his possession, does not involve any “part of the merits” or affect “a substantial right” (see Civ. Prac. Act, § 609). Beldoek, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 704, 214 N.Y.S.2d 63, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/korobkin-v-chalek-nyappdiv-1961.