Kornos v. Kornos

Connecticut Superior Court

Kornos v. Kornos

110 A.2d 656, 19 Conn. Super. Ct. 204, 19 Conn. Supp. 204, 1954 Conn. Super. LEXIS 126

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedDecember 3, 1954

DocketFile No. J 1096

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 110 A.2d 656 (Kornos v. Kornos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kornos v. Kornos, 110 A.2d 656, 19 Conn. Super. Ct. 204, 19 Conn. Supp. 204, 1954 Conn. Super. LEXIS 126 (Colo. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

In the divorce judgment, March 20, 1946, defendant was ordered to pay plaintiff alimony of $15 per week. On January 16, 1948, this judgment was amended and the alimony fixed at $5 per week. On July 31, 1954, the plaintiff married again. *Page 205

Save in the most exceptional circumstances, the inference is drawn from the remarriage of a wife that she has elected to obtain her support from her second husband and has thereby abandoned the provision made for her support by the court in its award of alimony from her first husband. Cary v. Cary,112 Conn. 256, 261. However, the judgment for alimony must stand until it is judicially modified or vacated. Id., 262.

The defendant is allowed ten days to file a motion for the vacation of the judgment for alimony, as of the date of the remarriage. The motion for judgment for contempt is continued until the hearing upon the motion to vacate, if the latter is filed. Otherwise it may be claimed after ten days.

Counsel stated that there was a small amount in arrears on July 31, 1954. This should be adjusted between the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the divorce judgment, March 20, 1946, defendant was ordered to pay plaintiff alimony of $15 per week. On January 16, 1948, this judgment was amended and the alimony fixed at $5 per week. On July 31, 1954, the plaintiff married again. *Page 205

Save in the most exceptional circumstances, the inference is drawn from the remarriage of a wife that she has elected to obtain her support from her second husband and has thereby abandoned the provision made for her support by the court in its award of alimony from her first husband. Cary v. Cary,112 Conn. 256, 261. However, the judgment for alimony must stand until it is judicially modified or vacated. Id., 262.

The defendant is allowed ten days to file a motion for the vacation of the judgment for alimony, as of the date of the remarriage. The motion for judgment for contempt is continued until the hearing upon the motion to vacate, if the latter is filed. Otherwise it may be claimed after ten days.

Counsel stated that there was a small amount in arrears on July 31, 1954. This should be adjusted between the parties.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 A.2d 656, 19 Conn. Super. Ct. 204, 19 Conn. Supp. 204, 1954 Conn. Super. LEXIS 126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kornos-v-kornos-connsuperct-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack