Kornit v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kornit v. Board of Education

54 A.D.2d 959, 388 N.Y.S.2d 643, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14873

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 22, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 54 A.D.2d 959 (Kornit v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kornit v. Board of Education, 54 A.D.2d 959, 388 N.Y.S.2d 643, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14873 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for breach of a collective bargaining agreement, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 17, 1975, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The collective bargaining agreement between plaintiffs union and the defendant provided the exclusive methods for the settlement of grievances. The use of the word "may” in the article entitled "Grievance Procedure” should not be construed to mean that arbitration was an optional method. We believe that the intention of the parties to the agreement was that disputes of this type be settled through the grievance procedure as set forth in the collective bargaining agreement. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for breach of a collective bargaining agreement, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 17, 1975, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The collective bargaining agreement between plaintiffs union and the defendant provided the exclusive methods for the settlement of grievances. The use of the word "may” in the article entitled "Grievance Procedure” should not be construed to mean that arbitration was an optional method. We believe that the intention of the parties to the agreement was that disputes of this type be settled through the grievance procedure as set forth in the collective bargaining agreement. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 959, 388 N.Y.S.2d 643, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kornit-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack