Kornit v. Board of Education

54 A.D.2d 959, 388 N.Y.S.2d 643, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14873
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 22, 1976·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for breach of a collective bargaining agreement, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 17, 1975, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The collective bargaining agreement between plaintiffs union and the defendant provided the exclusive methods for the settlement of grievances. The use of the word "may” in the article entitled "Grievance Procedure” should not be construed to mean that arbitration was an optional method. We believe that the intention of the parties to the agreement was that disputes of this type be settled through the grievance procedure as set forth in the collective bargaining agreement. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kornit v. Board of Education, 54 A.D.2d 959, 388 N.Y.S.2d 643, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14873 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

54 A.D.2d 959 (Kornit v. Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sheehan v. Board of Education
87 A.D.2d 872 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Berlyn v. Board of Education of the East Meadow Union Free School District
80 A.D.2d 572 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Olton v. County of Westchester
75 A.D.2d 844 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Grozek v. Ragu Foods, Inc.
63 A.D.2d 858 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)