Korngold v. Korngold

857 N.E.2d 1131, 7 N.Y.3d 861, 824 N.Y.S.2d 599, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 3339
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 24, 2006·Published

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that appellant has failed to establish timeliness as required by section 500.22 (b) (2) of the Rules of Practice of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.22 [b] [2]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Korngold v. Korngold, 857 N.E.2d 1131, 7 N.Y.3d 861, 824 N.Y.S.2d 599, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 3339 (N.Y. 2006).

857 N.E.2d 1131 (Korngold v. Korngold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.