Kornfeld v. David Stevenson Brewing Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Kornfeld v. David Stevenson Brewing Co.

111 N.Y.S. 641

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 30, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 111 N.Y.S. 641 (Kornfeld v. David Stevenson Brewing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kornfeld v. David Stevenson Brewing Co., 111 N.Y.S. 641 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this action, before a jury, to recover an allowance alleged to be due on beer sold by defendant to plaintiffs, the trial justice dismissed the complaint improperly, because there was a material, even crucial, fact in dispute, viz., whether the promised allowance was or was not for the “license year” running from May, 1905, to May, 1906, and this should have been submitted. The judgment must therefore be reversed, and a new trial ordered.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this action, before a jury, to recover an allowance alleged to be due on beer sold by defendant to plaintiffs, the trial justice dismissed the complaint improperly, because there was a material, even crucial, fact in dispute, viz., whether the promised allowance was or was not for the “license year” running from May, 1905, to May, 1906, and this should have been submitted. The judgment must therefore be reversed, and a new trial ordered.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 N.Y.S. 641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kornfeld-v-david-stevenson-brewing-co-nyappterm-1908.