KORNEGAY v. SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia
DecidedMarch 6, 2020
Docket5:19-cv-00317
StatusUnknown

This text of KORNEGAY v. SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE (KORNEGAY v. SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
KORNEGAY v. SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE, (M.D. Ga. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION SHARON RENEA KORNEGAY, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. 5:19-cv-00317-TES SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE, Defendant.

ORDER

Plaintiff Kornegay filed suit against Defendant on August 8, 2019. [Doc. 1]. Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires a plaintiff to serve each defendant with a copy of both the summons and the complaint unless a defendant waives service. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(1), (d). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) requires a plaintiff to serve those copies upon a defendant within 90 days after the filing of the complaint. Thus, Plaintiff’s deadline for serving Defendant with a copy of the summons and complaint passed on November 6, 2019. To date, there is no indication that service has been perfected in this case. On February 11, 2020, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause within 21 days why the case should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). [Doc. 3]. The Court warned Plaintiff that his failure to comply with the Court’s Order would result in the dismissal of Plaintiff's action. [Id., p. 2]. The time for compliance passed with no response from Plaintiff.

Accordingly, because Plaintiff has failed to respond to the show cause order or otherwise prosecute his case, the Court DISMISSES without prejudice the Plaintiff’s case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Brown v. Tallahassee Police Dep’t, 205 F. App’x 802, 802

(11th Cir. 2006) (per curiam) (first citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and then citing Lopez v. Aransas Cty. Indep. Sch. Dist., 570 F.2d 541, 544 (5th Cir. 1978)) (“The court may dismiss an action sua sponte under Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute or failure to obey a court

order.”). SO ORDERED, this 6th day of March, 2020. S/ Tilman E. Self, III TILMAN E. SELF, III, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

David M. Brown v. Tallahassee Police Department
205 F. App'x 802 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
Lopez v. Aransas County Independent School District
570 F.2d 541 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
KORNEGAY v. SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kornegay-v-secretary-of-the-air-force-gamd-2020.