Kornegay v. Heath
This text of 135 S.E.2d 213 (Kornegay v. Heath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As to each and all issues, there was ample evidence to support the jury’s verdict. Assignments of error pertinent to the agency, negligence and contributory negligence issues are untenable. With reference to assignments of error pertinent to the issue as to damages: It may be conceded certain of the court’s rulings relating to the admissibility of evidence are not free from error. However, after full consideration, we have concluded such errors did not substantially prejudice defendants and do not constitute sufficient ground for a new trial either of the entire case or of the issue relating to damages. In these circumstances, the verdict and judgment will not be disturbed.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 S.E.2d 213, 261 N.C. 515, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kornegay-v-heath-nc-1964.