Kornbrust v. 1037 Main Street Condominium
This text of 212 A.D.2d 582 (Kornbrust v. 1037 Main Street Condominium) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant City of Peekskill appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), dated October 22, 1993, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied the motion of the City of Peekskill for summary judgment because triable issues of fact exist with regard to whether it treated the private road in question as a public road and had exerted control over it (see, Vastola v City of New York, 289 NY 310). Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
212 A.D.2d 582, 623 N.Y.S.2d 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kornbrust-v-1037-main-street-condominium-nyappdiv-1995.