Kornacki v. Gurden

Michigan Supreme Court

Kornacki v. Gurden

717 N.W.2d 333, 475 Mich. 908

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 19, 2006·No. 130815·Published

Opinion

717 N.W.2d 333 (2006) 475 Mich. 908

Mark KORNACKI, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Elliot GURDEN and Paula Gurden, Defendant-Appellants.

Docket No. 130815. COA No. 257646.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

July 19, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 16, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

717 N.W.2d 333 (2006) 475 Mich. 908

Mark KORNACKI, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Elliot GURDEN and Paula Gurden, Defendant-Appellants.

Docket No. 130815. COA No. 257646.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

July 19, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 16, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Kornacki v. Gurden, 717 N.W.2d 333, 475 Mich. 908 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

717 N.W.2d 333 (Kornacki v. Gurden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Mark KORNACKI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Elliot GURDEN and Paula Gurden, Defendant-Appellants.

Mark KORNACKI, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Elliot GURDEN and Paula Gurden, Defendant-Appellants.