Korn v. First Unum Life Insurance
57 A.D.3d 948, 869 N.Y.2d 790
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
[949]*949Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff (see Campbell v City of Elmira, 84 NY2d 505, 509 [1994]), we find that a valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences could lead a rational person to the conclusion reached by the jury herein. Moreover, the verdict was supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence (see Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 134 [1985]). Skelos, J.P., Santucci, McCarthy and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Korn v. First Unum Life Insurance, 57 A.D.3d 948, 869 N.Y.2d 790 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
57 A.D.3d 948 (Korn v. First Unum Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Yellow Book of New York, L.P. v. Cataldo
81 A.D.3d 638 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)