Korn v. Birnn

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Korn v. Birnn

140 N.Y.S. 987

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedApril 10, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 140 N.Y.S. 987 (Korn v. Birnn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Korn v. Birnn, 140 N.Y.S. 987 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

LEHMAN, J.

The plaintiff claims that on or about the 15th day of May, 1912, the defendant entered into a written lease of an apartment for the term of 14 months, beginning June 1, 1912, at a rental of $60 per month. The defendant occupied the apartment and paid rent for the month of July, but paid no rent for the month of August. The plaintiff, therefore, seeks to recover the rent for the month of August, and also the expense of preparing, the apartment for the tenant’s occupancy.

[988]*988[1,2] It appears that on May 15th the parties signed a written memorandum setting forth the term of the letting and the monthly rental, and that the defendant was to sign a written lease in a specified form before moving in. The memorandum shows an agreement upon all the terms of the lease, and constitutes a valid lease. Corn v. Bergmann, 138 App. Div. 260, 123 N. Y. Supp. 160; Pelletreau v. Brennan, 113 App. Div. 806, 99 N. Y. Supp. 955. The plaintiff is therefore entitled to recover the August rent and the telephone charges. He is, however, on no possible theory entitled to the expense of preparing the apartment for the tenant’s use. The tenant, in return for the lease, has agreed to pay a fixed rent. He can be held to this promise,-but not for any other damages.

Judgment should be reversed, with costs, and judgment ordered for the plaintiff for the sum of $61.60, with costs in the court below. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LEHMAN, J.

The plaintiff claims that on or about the 15th day of May, 1912, the defendant entered into a written lease of an apartment for the term of 14 months, beginning June 1, 1912, at a rental of $60 per month. The defendant occupied the apartment and paid rent for the month of July, but paid no rent for the month of August. The plaintiff, therefore, seeks to recover the rent for the month of August, and also the expense of preparing, the apartment for the tenant’s occupancy.

[988]*988[1,2] It appears that on May 15th the parties signed a written memorandum setting forth the term of the letting and the monthly rental, and that the defendant was to sign a written lease in a specified form before moving in. The memorandum shows an agreement upon all the terms of the lease, and constitutes a valid lease. Corn v. Bergmann, 138 App. Div. 260, 123 N. Y. Supp. 160; Pelletreau v. Brennan, 113 App. Div. 806, 99 N. Y. Supp. 955. The plaintiff is therefore entitled to recover the August rent and the telephone charges. He is, however, on no possible theory entitled to the expense of preparing the apartment for the tenant’s use. The tenant, in return for the lease, has agreed to pay a fixed rent. He can be held to this promise,-but not for any other damages.

Judgment should be reversed, with costs, and judgment ordered for the plaintiff for the sum of $61.60, with costs in the court below. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 N.Y.S. 987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/korn-v-birnn-nyappterm-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack