Korman v. Trainer

101 A. 1051, 258 Pa. 362, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 850
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 22, 1917·No. Appeal, No. 34·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Under Cape May Real Estate Company v. Henderson, 231 Pa. 82, the affidavit of defense was properly regarded as insufficient by the learned court below, and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Korman v. Trainer, 101 A. 1051, 258 Pa. 362, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 850 (Pa. 1917).

101 A. 1051 (Korman v. Trainer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morrissey v. Arey
43 Pa. D. & C.2d 659 (Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas, 1967)
Aspden v. Kramer
74 Pa. D. & C. 193 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1950)
Clair v. Noce
72 Pa. D. & C. 216 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1950)
Brown v. Buckner
69 Pa. D. & C. 629 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1949)
Tudesco Et Ux. v. Wilson
60 A.2d 388 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1948)
Lickert v. Kemp
26 Pa. D. & C. 249 (Berks County Court of Common Pleas, 1936)
Sharr v. Mollier
15 Pa. D. & C. 697 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1930)
Alexander v. Wingett
206 P. 1087 (Montana Supreme Court, 1922)