Korman v. Trainer
101 A. 1051, 258 Pa. 362, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 850
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 22, 1917
DocketAppeal, No. 34
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases
This text of 101 A. 1051 (Korman v. Trainer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Korman v. Trainer, 101 A. 1051, 258 Pa. 362, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 850 (Pa. 1917).
Opinion
Under Cape May Real Estate Company v. Henderson, 231 Pa. 82, the affidavit of defense was properly regarded as insufficient by the learned court below, and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Morrissey v. Arey
43 Pa. D. & C.2d 659 (Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas, 1967)
Aspden v. Kramer
74 Pa. D. & C. 193 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1950)
Clair v. Noce
72 Pa. D. & C. 216 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1950)
Brown v. Buckner
69 Pa. D. & C. 629 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1949)
Tudesco Et Ux. v. Wilson
60 A.2d 388 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1948)
Lickert v. Kemp
26 Pa. D. & C. 249 (Berks County Court of Common Pleas, 1936)
Sharr v. Mollier
15 Pa. D. & C. 697 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1930)
Alexander v. Wingett
206 P. 1087 (Montana Supreme Court, 1922)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
101 A. 1051, 258 Pa. 362, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/korman-v-trainer-pa-1917.