Koriath
This text of 189 Ct. Cl. 571 (Koriath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pay and allowances; shipment of household goods.— Plaintiff, upon retirement in November 1960 from the United States Army, traveled with his dependents from Fort Irwin, California, to Milwaukee, Wisconsin, his selected home of retirement. Plaintiff, in connection with his employment by the Veterans Administration, in July 1961 was transferred from Wisconsin to Cheyenne, Wyoming, having postponed shipment of his household goods until he obtained a permanent post with the Veterans Administration. He seeks to recover the cost of the shipment of his household goods from Fort Irwin to Cheyenne, alleging that, while the Government in 1961 denied his request that the goods 'be shipped at Government expense to Cheyenne on the ground that Cheyenne was not plaintiff’s selected home of retirement as defined by applicable statutes, the statute authorizing payment of moving expenses was changed subsequent to the shipment of his goods to Cheyenne to provide that a member of the Armed Forces retiring with pay is entitled to have his household goods shipped to a location other than his selected home of [572]*572retirement. Defendant has moved to dismiss the petition, and upon consideration thereof, without oral argument, the court concludes that plaintiff’s alleged claim is barred by the statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. § 2501, and that his petition fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, citing Union Pac. R.R. v. Laramie Stock Yards Co., 231 U.S. 190, 199 (1913) and Greene v. United States, 376 U.S. 149, 160 (1964). On October 31, 1969, the court ordered that defendant’s motion be granted, and dismissed the petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
189 Ct. Cl. 571, 1969 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 101, 1969 WL 2974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koriath-cc-1969.