Korenkiewicz v. York Motor Express Co.
10 A.2d 864, 138 Pa. Super. 210, 1940 Pa. Super. LEXIS 342
Opinion
No appeal was taken from the order of the court of common pleas granting a new trial, on motion of the plaintiff, for inadequacy of the verdict. The order dismissing defendant’s motion for judgment in its favor, non obstante veredicto, is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Brown, who presided at the trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Korenkiewicz v. York Motor Express Co., 10 A.2d 864, 138 Pa. Super. 210, 1940 Pa. Super. LEXIS 342 (Pa. Ct. App. 1939).
10 A.2d 864 (Korenkiewicz v. York Motor Express Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wilt v. Blazier
114 A.2d 111 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1955)
Dayen Et Vir v. Penn Bus Co.
69 A.2d 151 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1949)
Williams v. Stern
40 A.2d 101 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1944)
National Chair Co., Inc. v. Barrall
21 A.2d 36 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
Haas v. Wesley
14 A.2d 170 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1940)