Korenkiewicz v. York Motor Express Co.
10 A.2d 864, 138 Pa. Super. 210, 1940 Pa. Super. LEXIS 342
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 11, 1939
DocketAppeal, 265
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases
This text of 10 A.2d 864 (Korenkiewicz v. York Motor Express Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Korenkiewicz v. York Motor Express Co., 10 A.2d 864, 138 Pa. Super. 210, 1940 Pa. Super. LEXIS 342 (Pa. Ct. App. 1939).
Opinion
No appeal was taken from the order of the court of common pleas granting a new trial, on motion of the plaintiff, for inadequacy of the verdict. The order dismissing defendant’s motion for judgment in its favor, non obstante veredicto, is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Brown, who presided at the trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wilt v. Blazier
114 A.2d 111 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1955)
Dayen Et Vir v. Penn Bus Co.
69 A.2d 151 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1949)
Williams v. Stern
40 A.2d 101 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1944)
National Chair Co., Inc. v. Barrall
21 A.2d 36 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
Haas v. Wesley
14 A.2d 170 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1940)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 A.2d 864, 138 Pa. Super. 210, 1940 Pa. Super. LEXIS 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/korenkiewicz-v-york-motor-express-co-pasuperct-1939.