Korelis v. McDonald's Restaurant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Korelis v. McDonald's Restaurant

298 A.D.2d 276, 748 N.Y.S.2d 485, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10167

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 24, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 298 A.D.2d 276 (Korelis v. McDonald's Restaurant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Korelis v. McDonald's Restaurant, 298 A.D.2d 276, 748 N.Y.S.2d 485, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10167 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn Shafer, J.), entered on or about March 9, 2001, which denied plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint so as to increase the demand for damages, and for a transfer of the action from Civil Court to Supreme Court, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered on or about May 11, 2001, which denied plaintiff’s motion to reargue, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.

The motion court correctly held that plaintiff failed to present any credible evidence that his damages exceed the monetary jurisdiction of Civil Court. Concur — Williams, P.J., Buckley, Sullivan and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn Shafer, J.), entered on or about March 9, 2001, which denied plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint so as to increase the demand for damages, and for a transfer of the action from Civil Court to Supreme Court, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered on or about May 11, 2001, which denied plaintiff’s motion to reargue, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.

The motion court correctly held that plaintiff failed to present any credible evidence that his damages exceed the monetary jurisdiction of Civil Court. Concur — Williams, P.J., Buckley, Sullivan and Lerner, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

298 A.D.2d 276, 748 N.Y.S.2d 485, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/korelis-v-mcdonalds-restaurant-nyappdiv-2002.