Kordenbrock v. Scroggy
896 F.2d 1457, 1990 WL 21439
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 20, 1990·No. Nos. 88-5467, 89-5107·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
ORDER
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this Court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this Court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as practicable.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kordenbrock v. Scroggy, 896 F.2d 1457, 1990 WL 21439 (6th Cir. 1990).
896 F.2d 1457 (Kordenbrock v. Scroggy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Paul Kordenbrock v. Gene Scroggy, Warden, Kentucky State Penitentiary
919 F.2d 1091 (Sixth Circuit, 1991)