Korcsmaros v. Fluor Corp. Long Term Disability Plan
This text of 19 F. App'x 52 (Korcsmaros v. Fluor Corp. Long Term Disability Plan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
George E. Korcsmaros appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Korcsmaros v. Fluor Corp. Long Term Disability Plan, No. CA-00-401-5 (S.D.W.Va. Feb. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 F. App'x 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/korcsmaros-v-fluor-corp-long-term-disability-plan-ca4-2001.