Korcsmaros v. Fluor Corp. Long Term Disability Plan

19 F. App'x 52
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 11, 2001·No. No. 01-1385·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

George E. Korcsmaros appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Korcsmaros v. Fluor Corp. Long Term Disability Plan, No. CA-00-401-5 (S.D.W.Va. Feb. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Korcsmaros v. Fluor Corp. Long Term Disability Plan, 19 F. App'x 52 (4th Cir. 2001).

19 F. App'x 52 (Korcsmaros v. Fluor Corp. Long Term Disability Plan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.