Korangy v. Kaimona, Inc.

704 So. 2d 1150, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 896, 1998 WL 39373
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 4, 1998
DocketNo. 96-3731
StatusPublished

This text of 704 So. 2d 1150 (Korangy v. Kaimona, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Korangy v. Kaimona, Inc., 704 So. 2d 1150, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 896, 1998 WL 39373 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the lower court’s final judgment of dismissal for lack of prosecution as Appellants showed no good cause which would prevent dismissal. Appellants had adequate time to comply with the settlement agreement and failed to do so. Leeks v. Dolling, 350 So.2d 10 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); see also Valdes v. Perez, 645 So.2d 590 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Caldwell v. Mantei, 544 So.2d 252 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

STONE, C.J., and PARIENTE, BARBARA J., and KARLAN, SANDY, Associate Judges, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Caldwell v. Mantei
544 So. 2d 252 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Leeks v. Dolling
350 So. 2d 10 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Valdes v. Perez
645 So. 2d 590 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
704 So. 2d 1150, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 896, 1998 WL 39373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/korangy-v-kaimona-inc-fladistctapp-1998.