Kopra v. Aquino

298 A.D.2d 881, 748 N.Y.S.2d 79

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kopra v. Aquino. Read the opinion of the Court — 298 A.D.2d 880 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 1, 2002·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

—Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Martoche, J.), granted September 21, 2001, which denied plaintiffs motion to renew and to vacate judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Kopra v Aquino ([appeal No. 1] 298 AD2d 880). Present — Wisner, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder and Kehoe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Martoche, J.), granted September 21, 2001, which denied plaintiffs motion to renew and to vacate judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Kopra v Aquino ([appeal No. 1] 298 AD2d 880). Present — Wisner, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder and Kehoe, JJ.

Kopra v. Aquino, 298 A.D.2d 881, 748 N.Y.S.2d 79 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

298 A.D.2d 881 (Kopra v. Aquino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Kopra v. Aquino

298 A.D.2d 880 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Opinion

Related