Koppman v. Board of Education of the City School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Koppman v. Board of Education of the City School District

95 A.D.2d 777, 463 N.Y.S.2d 390, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18688

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 6, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 95 A.D.2d 777 (Koppman v. Board of Education of the City School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Koppman v. Board of Education of the City School District, 95 A.D.2d 777, 463 N.Y.S.2d 390, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18688 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondents to pay petitioner back pay for the period from February 14,1979 until September 6,1979, during which time she had been discontinued from her position as a probationary teacher of high school English, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aronin, J.), dated January 9, 1981, which dismissed the petition. Judgment modified, on the law, by adding thereto a provision that the dismissal of the petition is without prejudice to the institution of whatever further proceedings the petitioner may deem advisable. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements (see Matter of Golomb v Board of Educ., 92 AD2d 256). Thompson, J. P., O’Connor, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondents to pay petitioner back pay for the period from February 14,1979 until September 6,1979, during which time she had been discontinued from her position as a probationary teacher of high school English, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aronin, J.), dated January 9, 1981, which dismissed the petition. Judgment modified, on the law, by adding thereto a provision that the dismissal of the petition is without prejudice to the institution of whatever further proceedings the petitioner may deem advisable. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements (see Matter of Golomb v Board of Educ., 92 AD2d 256). Thompson, J. P., O’Connor, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 A.D.2d 777, 463 N.Y.S.2d 390, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koppman-v-board-of-education-of-the-city-school-district-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack