Koppenhoefer v. State
632 So. 2d 734, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1786, 1994 WL 68871
Opinion
The parties agree that the trial court erred in sua sponte assessing a public defender’s fee. See In Interest of R.B., 582 So.2d 163 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Accordingly, we reverse the imposition of that fee.
The parties also agree that the trial court erred in assessing the cost of prosecution against appellant without consideration of financial capabilities. See Smith v. State, 543 So.2d 348 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). Accordingly, we reverse the imposition of costs and remand with direction for such consideration.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Koppenhoefer v. State, 632 So. 2d 734, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1786, 1994 WL 68871 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
632 So. 2d 734 (Koppenhoefer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Interest of RB
582 So. 2d 163 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Smith v. State
543 So. 2d 348 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)