Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Koppenhoefer v. State

Koppenhoefer v. State

632 So. 2d 734, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1786, 1994 WL 68871
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 9, 1994
DocketNo. 93-1239
StatusPublished

This text of 632 So. 2d 734 (Koppenhoefer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Koppenhoefer v. State, 632 So. 2d 734, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1786, 1994 WL 68871 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The parties agree that the trial court erred in sua sponte assessing a public defender’s fee. See In Interest of R.B., 582 So.2d 163 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Accordingly, we reverse the imposition of that fee.

The parties also agree that the trial court erred in assessing the cost of prosecution against appellant without consideration of financial capabilities. See Smith v. State, 543 So.2d 348 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). Accordingly, we reverse the imposition of costs and remand with direction for such consideration.

GLICKSTEIN, FARMER and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Interest of RB
582 So. 2d 163 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Smith v. State
543 So. 2d 348 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
632 So. 2d 734, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1786, 1994 WL 68871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koppenhoefer-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.