Koppenhoefer v. Roberts

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Koppenhoefer v. Roberts

654 So. 2d 204, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4042, 1995 WL 229245

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 19, 1995

DocketNo. 94-2837

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 654 So. 2d 204 (Koppenhoefer v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Koppenhoefer v. Roberts, 654 So. 2d 204, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4042, 1995 WL 229245 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order granting summary final judgment in favor of the grantee. We reverse.

This case involves the inter vivos transfer by deed of a parcel of real estate by the grantors, Appellant/Norman A. Koppenhoe-fer, and his now deceased wife, to the grantee, Appellee/Diane R. Roberts, his granddaughter. The deed conveys a remainder interest to Ms. Roberts while retaining a life estate for Mr. Koppenhoefer. Appellant seeks to cancel the deed, which has been recorded, but which he has retained in his possession since its execution.

Because we find there remains a genuine issue of material fact with respect to Mr. Koppenhoefer’s intent to convey the property, we remand this cause back to the trial [205]*205court. See Smith v. Owens, 91 Fla. 995, 108 So. 891 (1926).

GUNTHER, POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI