Koppenhaffer v. Isaacs

7 Watts 170
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 15, 1838·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The costs of an issue devisavit vel non must be borne by the parties, as they litigated for their individual interests and not for the benefit of the estate. The plaintiffs contended for their legacies under a supposititious will, and are no more entitled, as distributees, to contribution to the costs of litigation, than would a devisee, in the like circumstances, be entitled to the costs of an ejectment against the intestate’s heirs. It is a species of litigation of which the fund is not to bear the burthen.

Judgment below reversed, and judgment for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Koppenhaffer v. Isaacs, 7 Watts 170 (Pa. 1838).

7 Watts 170 (Koppenhaffer v. Isaacs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baughman's Estate
126 A. 53 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Lotzgesell v. Cydell
113 P. 1105 (Washington Supreme Court, 1911)
Reimer's Estate
28 A. 186 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1893)
Allen v. Seaward
52 N.W. 557 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1892)
Raines v. Raines's Executors
51 Ala. 237 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1874)
Henderson v. Simmons
33 Ala. 291 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1858)
Conn v. Stumm
31 Pa. 14 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1854)
Geddis's Appeal
9 Watts 284 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1840)