Koppelman v. Sunset Wine Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Koppelman v. Sunset Wine Co.

263 A.D. 872, 32 N.Y.S.2d 795, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7151

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 5, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 872 (Koppelman v. Sunset Wine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Koppelman v. Sunset Wine Co., 263 A.D. 872, 32 N.Y.S.2d 795, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7151 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding brought by petitioners, pursuant to sections 123 and 124 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, to obtain an order permanently enjoining and restraining Sunset Wine Co., Inc., its officers, agents and employees “ from selling wines at retail to any person not known to be a householder and/or from selling wines at retail without making delivery thereof at the homes of the purchasers,” an order was duly made in effect granting to the petitioners the relief prayed for. From that order Sunset Wine Co., Inc., appeals. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, payable by the Sunset Wine Co., Inc., to the petitioners. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding brought by petitioners, pursuant to sections 123 and 124 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, to obtain an order permanently enjoining and restraining Sunset Wine Co., Inc., its officers, agents and employees “ from selling wines at retail to any person not known to be a householder and/or from selling wines at retail without making delivery thereof at the homes of the purchasers,” an order was duly made in effect granting to the petitioners the relief prayed for. From that order Sunset Wine Co., Inc., appeals. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, payable by the Sunset Wine Co., Inc., to the petitioners. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 872, 32 N.Y.S.2d 795, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koppelman-v-sunset-wine-co-nyappdiv-1942.