Kopp v. Grobart

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Kopp v. Grobart

176 A. 323, 114 N.J.L. 270, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 222

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 10, 1935·Published

Opinion

*271 Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court, and printed in 12 N. J. Mis. R. 488.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*271 Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court, and printed in 12 N. J. Mis. R. 488.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Kopp v. Grobart, 176 A. 323, 114 N.J.L. 270, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 222 (N.J. 1935).

Pincite

176 A. 323 (Kopp v. Grobart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.