Kopochik v. Pennsylvania Coal Co.
This text of 91 A. 845 (Kopochik v. Pennsylvania Coal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the facts in this case, which appear in the opinion of the court denying the motion of the defendant for judgment non obstante veredicto, the negligence of the defendant and the contributory negligence of the plaintiff were questions for the jury, and, as we have not been persuaded that any reversible error was committed in submitting those questions to them, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 A. 845, 245 Pa. 489, 1914 Pa. LEXIS 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kopochik-v-pennsylvania-coal-co-pa-1914.