Koplow v. Chelsea Division of the District Court Department
Opinion
David Lee Koplow appeals from a judgment of a single justice of this court denying his petition for relief in the nature of certiorari, G. L. c. 249, § 4. Koplow had requested that this court assume jurisdiction over his appeal from a conviction of assault and battery where the Appeals Court had vacated the entry of the appeal, without prejudice, because the record of the criminal proceedings was then incomplete. The Commonwealth represents, however — [1004] and Koplow does not deny — that the record is now complete. Accordingly, nothing appears to prevent Koplow from being able to pursue his appeal in the Appeals Court.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
859 N.E.2d 820 (Koplow v. Chelsea Division of the District Court Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.